I've been thinking about "bad competitors" after coming across this excellent speech on the future of newspapers by Phil Meyer, Knight Chair in Journalism, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill at a conference in August From "Valley" Times May 7 magazine: Falling for super-geek.

Newmark drives a Prius, a petrol-saving hybrid car. Buckmaster has craigslist owned a car. They both take the bus to work in the morning. For Newmark and Buckmaster, the internet has a higher calling than money-making. The Craigslist duo could easily join the dotcom rich list if they chose to sell the company. The idea is anathema to them. There are bad competitors in the enterprise IT arena, valley if you look at the way enterprise software competitors are trying to turn their competitor's core markets into commodities.

It's an interesting dynamic that, in total, would seem to simply accelerate the commoditization of everything. Take a look at Yahoo Music, one of my favorite web services. There are more than a news aggregators for example, and more coming. How many "wiki" companies are there?

Every new idea in what they call "Web 2. Overseas IT services companies that do it for far less than local companies. They could get more money for their services but choose not to so that they can win more business. Dumping meant producing chips for less than the cost of their production, to win market share.

That became illegal. It's something PR companies everywhere will have to face. And there are many other examples of competitors either behaving stupidly and ruining the market for everyone.

Or, competitors that don't monetize the markets to their fullest opportunity and thus are not creating wealth for themselves, their investors, or their employees. Does a company have a moral or ethical obligation to increase the monetization of a market so that it can employ more people and provide additional services for its communities?

Are companies that use very profitable business groups to prop up less profitable businesses groups acting as bad competitors?

Ex-Financial Times Journalist Tom Foremski @ the Collision of Technology and Media

For example, Hewlett-Packard's printer group has subsidized the Valley group in the past. Are the telcos and cable TV companies "good competitors" because they seek to block any Internet threat that would commoditize their services and thus force massive layoffs?? Silicon Valley Watcher — reporting from the disruptive intersection of technology and media. Details of license.

Valley, Alabama

Powered by. The rise of the bad competitor. Craigslist et al. They have a monopoly on being newspapers. The point is that the services they provide are being provided cheaper and more efficiently And this is going to https://telegram-web.online/cowboy-dating-site-reviews.php. From Stack War : SAP's trying to commoditize the database, by promoting, for instance, the open-source MySQL; Oracle's trying to commoditize middleware, also by promoting open-source options; and IBM's happy to commoditize the applications while maintaining an craigslist hatch to "business process automation" up above the stack.

So where does this trend lead?

Classifieds for Valley, AL

Should it be illegal to make a loss in https://telegram-web.online/dating-site-for-free.php to gain market share? Should it be illegal for craigslist to make bad decisions that ruin the market for everyone? This bad competitor trend will only intensify because it can't be stopped. What happens next? Some modules are disabled because cookies are declined.

Accept cookies to experience the full functionality of this page. Learn more. We use cookies to optimize the website, no personal information is stored.