I am a Marine on fire for The Lord. I Love your work sir, and I am a huge fan!

#555 Dating the Gospels

My question is, I feel like the arguments for saying the gospels where written before 70A. D, is very powerful. D and the other gospels where written after 70 A. Thank you sir. United States. Jacob, thank you for your gospel to our country! May God make you a bright light among dating fellow Marines!

The arguments for the traditional dating of the Gospels have been aptly compared to a line of drunks reeling arm in arm down the street. Trip up one, and they all collapse. Since it is generally agreed that Mark was one gospel the sources used by Matthew and Luke, it follows that if Mark was written around AD dating, then the other Gospels must have been written later.

By contrast, if we begin with Luke and Matthew and work backwards, then the date of Mark is pushed back well before AD The evidence that Acts was written prior to AD 70 e. Such a dating makes eminently good sense. It is incredible that the early church would have waited for decades before committing the Jesus story on which it was founded to writing.

So why do scholars find the evidence for a later date of Mark so compelling? But this argument cannot bear the weight placed on it.

Dr. craig’s response

His predictions resemble dating closely the Old Testament descriptions of the destruction of Jerusalem article source BC by the Babylonian army than descriptions of the Roman destruction in AD Again, this makes such good sense. As a prophet Jesus would naturally draw upon the Old Testament for something hookah hookup pity predicted judgement upon Jerusalem.

If this argument for a gospel date click at this page Mark falls, so do all the dates dependent upon it. While the historical credibility of the Gospels in nowise depends on this earlier dating, still such an early date strengthens all the more the case for their gospel reliability.

Q Hey, Dr. Craig, I am a Marine on fire dating The Lord. Thank you sir Jacob United States.