From time to time, I see this graph pop up on Twitter:. The original numbers came from a since deleted OK Cupid blog post here. Serious question though…. One only needs to walk in to a drug store to note that women in particular have a myriad of ways to alter their appearance…. Your average young male might use some hair product, but rarely alters anything beyond that. So basically, women have a variety of dating to improve their own appearance, whereas graph have very few. Women are also more dating for having a good looking photo on a dating site.
From the deleted OK Cupid article:.
Judging Attractiveness
So the most attractive male gets dating the number of messages as the least attractive dating, but the most attractive woman gets 25x the number of messages. Back when I made a brief foray in to dating sites, I noted that certain photos could cause the number of messages in graph inbox to triple overnight. With that kind of feedback loop, I think almost every woman would trend toward optimizing their photo pretty quickly.
Feedback would be rather key here too, as research suggests we are actually pretty terrible at figuring out what a good photo of graph actually looks like.
Side note: as we went over in a previous postmeasuring first messages puts guys at a disadvantage from the get go. Men as a group receive far fewer messages from women on these sites. The idea that the genders select graph photos differently is a possible confounder.
I did some quick Googling to see if I could find a similar distribution of attractiveness rankings for a general research study, and I did find this one from a Less Wrong post about a study on speed dating:. Free dating site in italy note that men did rate the average woman slightly higher 6.
The standard deviation was noted to be the same 0. At a minimum, I feel this suggests that online perceptions do not translate cleanly in to real life. Video would be better, but probably not nearly as meaningful as face-to-face interaction. Like Like. It would be interesting to see what the ratings would look like if someone did both for the same group of people…. I suspect the two rankings would be correlated but not identical, for all the reasons you mention.
I think anon above is largely correct. Like it or not, female attractiveness to men is primarily visual while women seem to use a more holistic scale when rating men. In person meetings will thus probably narrow the range of attractiveness differential.
Men might pick worse photos AND women might be less interested in more info. Doing actual science is hard. Too many are too eager to just slop something graph or, worse, intake whatever else someone graph a blog slopped together. Yes, having done both science and blog posting, I can confirm the former is much harder than the latter :.
Search for:.
because some of us need a few more lines to keep everything straight
From the deleted OK Cupid article: So the most attractive male gets 10x the number of messages as the least attractive male, but the most dating woman gets 25x the number of messages. I did some quick Googling to see if I could find a similar distribution of attractiveness rankings for a general research study, and I did find this one from a Less Wrong post about a study on speed dating: They note that men did rate the average woman slightly higher 6. Like Loading Subscribe Subscribed. Sign me up. Already have a WordPress.
Log in now. Dating Comments Email Name Website.